Many Christians when reading the Gospels will encounter passages such as Matthew 5:17-20. 17 “Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. 18 For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means…… Continue reading Matthew 5:17-20, Matthew 24:15-28 are NOT about the Second Return of Jesus
Month: January 2024
Is the Law of Moses “abolished”?
Is the Law of Moses “abolished” with in the New Covenant? It seems that this is the interpretation of many evangelicals. However, I don’t believe that the whole is nullified in the sense that there is no application of Old Testament principles in the New Testament. Rather, New Applications by the grace of Jesus as…… Continue reading Is the Law of Moses “abolished”?
Problems with Sola Scriptura in Protestantism
Denying the consensus and continuity of the Early Church teachings causes a person to 1) pick and choose teachings from the Early Church Fathers what supports their personal Theological framework and 2) denying the promise of Jesus, since He promised that the Gates of Hades would not prevail against the Church (Matthew 16:16-19). 3) presupposing…… Continue reading Problems with Sola Scriptura in Protestantism
Does Mark 2:27 Prove that The Sabbath is binding on all Creation?
Many Sabbatarians will use the verse Mark 2:27 in order to prove that observance of the Seventh-Day Sabbath. However, there are some flaws with this interpretation. Point 1) “Made for man” ≠ “Commanded for man” In my video, I point out that the Mark 2:27 explicitly says “made for man” not “commanded to man”. In…… Continue reading Does Mark 2:27 Prove that The Sabbath is binding on all Creation?
Home 